"However, the authors qualified their findings by reporting that after five months, sperm levels recovered. Thus the decreases were only temporary, they wrote. Put aside the fact that a five-month decrease hardly qualifies as temporary for someone trying to start a family - or compared to a “vaccine” that loses effectiveness against Omicron within weeks or months. As other writers have pointed out, the actual data in the paper do not really support the argument that sperm levels returned to normal after five months. In fact, by some measures, levels continued to decline. Rather than acknowledging this fact, the authors offered the best possible spin on their data, while at the same time publishing the figures themselves near the end of the paper so that other researchers could see the reality for themselves."
Comments